Thursday, November 28, 2019

Marshall Aid free essay sample

The Truman Doctrine was an international relations policy set forth by the U. S. President Harry Truman in a speech on March 12, 1947. The speech stated that the U. S. Would support Greece and Turkey with economic and military aid to prevent them from falling into the Soviet sphere of influence. Marshall Aid was the American initiative to aid Europe, in which the United States gave economic support to help rebuild European economies after the end of World War II in order to prevent the spread of Communism.With sufficient evidence, the answer to his essay question will show that even though the Truman Doctrine and Marshall Aid were successful, there were other events more successful than them at containing communism. The Truman Doctrine was seen as a successful policy for containing communism because it was Americas first public criticism of Russia, and it was their first real hostile act towards the Soviets. We will write a custom essay sample on Marshall Aid or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Just before the Truman Doctrine, Britain had announced that they couldnt afford to look after Greece and Turkey anymore, because of this America agreed to look after the two countries.Truman knew it was vital that he USSR did not take these two countries over as they would strengthen the threat of communism, and increase the spread of communism over Europe. The Truman Doctrines main aim was to stop the spread of communism and this is what it achieved. The Soviets couldnt take over Greece and Turkey so therefore it was successful at containing communism in this time period. The Marshall Aid was also seen as a successful policy. In this aid America were using their financial strength to stabilize and strengthen the economies of many European countries, that were not under Soviet influence.Although its intentions to contain communism were not biblically admitted, Stalin thought this was the case. Some of the countries that the Marshall Aid helped were the Netherlands, Belgium and many other countries that to America, were the right side of the Iron Curtain. The aim of the financial help was to make sure that the governments of each country were stable and strong enough to be able to resist communist threat/influence. From my own knowledge know that this policy worked well as it did stop the spread of communist in these countries, therefore it was a successful policy in the entailment of communism.Other factors that were also successful in the policy Of containment was the Berlin Airlift. The Berlin Airlift was used to help Britain and Americas part of Berlin to get food and resources. During the Yalta conference, when the relationship between the USSR, Britain and USA were at its best state, it was agreed that Germany and Berlin were to be split into four zones. One for each of the mentioned countries and one for France. This was also the time of the aforementioned Iron Curtain, and Berlin was behind this curtain.Due to this, USSR set up a blockade to stop America and KGB getting to their zone, as they knew that the lifestyle in their zones were much greater than that of Russians. This was known as the Berlin Blockade. Had America accepted this Blockade and allowed Russia to take over the whole of Germany, the spreading of communism would of exceeded the Iron Curtain, and been a huge threat to West Europe. This was not the case however, as America were not going to let this happen. Instead of using the blocked roads and rail tracks, American soldiers risked their lives by flying onto Berlin on armored aircrafts.By doing this they prevented any communist threat in Berlin, and then in turn, any past the Iron Curtain. This was a successful method of spreading communism because not only did it stop the threat of communism, it showed the German people of Berlin that America were willing to fight for their country and fight for their rights. Even though this wasnt as significant, it was giant step in gaining support from a country they had recently been at War with. The most successful policy of containing communism was the Berlin Airlift.This was the reason that America managed to get supplies to Germany and Berlin, and stop the Soviets from expanding past that iron curtain. Had America not gone through with the airlift, USSR would have been able to capture Berlin, and spread communism across the rest of Germany, and the rest of Europe. This would have been a massive threat to Britain and the west of the European countries. Even though the Marshall Aid and Traumas Doctrine were still successful at containing communism, the Airlift was the most successful policy.

Sunday, November 24, 2019

Je Ne Sais Quoi, That Indefinable Thing She Has

Je Ne Sais Quoi, That Indefinable Thing She Has Je ne sais quoi is a French idiomatic expression used so much in English that it has made it into the leading English dictionaries. In other words, it has been assimilated into the English language. Merriam-Webster describes je ne sais quoi as something (such as an appealing quality) that cannot be adequately described or expressed, as in This woman has a certain je ne sais quoi that I really like. In French, Larousse calls je ne sais quoi a thing one wouldnt know how to define but whose existence is understood intuitively. Je Ne Sais Quoi in French In French, the expression je ne sais quoi literally means I dont know what. It is often used for its literal meaning, not as an idiom. For example: Jai fait la vaisselle, le mà ©nage, le rà ©passage, et je ne sais quoi (dautre) encore. I did the dishes, the house-cleaning, I ironed, and I dont know what else. How the French Use It But the French also use it as we do  in English: a quality you cannot describe. We connect je ne sais quoi to the adjective describing it with de, like this: Cette fille a je ne sais quoi de fascinant. There is something fascinating about that girl. Note that the adjective is always masculine singular, even if the sentence refers to a girl or a  feminine noun. The adjective should agree with je ne sais quoi, which is masculine, singular. Two Spellings in French Or we can also use it,  as in English, as a noun: un je ne sais quoi or hyphenated as un je-ne-sais-quoi. Both spellings are correct. And we often use it with certain,  as in English: Elle avait un certain je-ne-sais-quoi de spà ©cial : lexpression de son regard peut-à ªtre. She had a certain special je ne sais quoi - the expression in her eyes perhaps. Finally, in spoken modern French, the je and the ne glide together, making the expression sound like jeun say kwa. A Word About Spelling This is a common expression that is recognizable in its correct spelling of  je ne sais quoi. It is even in English-language dictionaries. So there really is no excuse for misspelling this classic phrase as jena se qua, etc., as some anglophones tend to do. Just look it up in the dictionary. That woman with the special something will thank you. Sources Je-ne-sais-quoi. Larousse. Je ne sais quoi. Merriam-Webster, 2019.

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Western Civilization. Second World War Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Western Civilization. Second World War - Essay Example The basic causes of war are always found in international rivalries, thwarted desires of nations, and the ambitions of their leaders. Most historians agree that the seeds of the Second World War have been sown soon after the end of the First World War. During the months and years after the First World War, political and economic events like the treaty of Versailles, the great economic depression of 1929, the rise of Nazism, and Hitler’s ambitions for German expansion were some of the causes of the war to come. The treaty of Versailles signed in June 1919 by the allied powers who were the victors of the First World War was very harsh on Germany and held the country solely responsible for the war. The German people believed that Woodrow Wilson’s fourteen points program would be the basis for the treaty, but the French president Georges Clemenceau and the British prime minister David Lloyd George bowed before the anger of their people who demanded that Germany should be se verely punished for the suffering and devastation caused. The sentiment of the allies was as follows, â€Å"If these things are hardships for Germany, they are hardships which Germany has brought upon herself† (â€Å"Allied Reply†). The humiliating terms of the treaty whipped up feelings of anger and frustration among the Germans. Territorial losses, the reduction of the army and navy, and, above all, the fact that Germany was forced to accept the responsibility for having caused the war, were particularly galling. According to the treaty, Germany was forced to pay reparation for the damages suffered in the war by the victors; the map of Europe was redrawn, and parts of Germany were transferred to countries like France, Poland, Belgium, Denmark, and Czechoslovakia. The reparations that Germany was forced to pay was an added burden on the country’s already stretched finances. The German economy, in shambles after the war, was further eroded by the fact that the c ountry had lost some of its colonies that were rich sources of income and raw materials. Besides the economic burden, Germany had lost millions of her able bodied men who would have constituted a strong work force. The people thought the government had betrayed them, so they did not trust it. The monarchy was overthrown and a new democratic republic called the Weimar Republic was proclaimed; it fell in 1933 under the onslaught of the myriad problems Germany faced. Hitler used the treaty of Versailles as a battle cry to rally the people and promised that Germany would take her rightful place as a strong nation before long. This was a balm to the wounded pride of the nation, and people were ready to back Hitler by 1933. By 1929, the German economy was just beginning to recover from the effects of the First World War with the efforts of Gustav Stresemann, Germany’s untiring foreign minister, beginning to show results. The stock market crash of 1929 that reverberated across the g lobe and sent financial markets around the world into a tailspin also crushed German hopes of economic recovery. The German economy, propped up by loans from America, was â€Å"only flourishing on the surface. Germany is in fact dancing on a volcano. If the short-term credits are called in, a large section of our economy would collapse† (â€Å"Weimar Republic and the Great Depression†). Just before Stresemann’s death, his words have proved prophetic. The German economy, which depended on American loans for capital, was badly hit when America needed the funds to prop up her own faltering economy after the crash. Foreign trade dried up, and German industry ground to a halt. As a result, workers were laid off, which has increased unemployment and resulted in the misery of the people just beginning to look forward to a brighter